CMC时空档案

Constitutional Amendment: Presidential Term Limits Removed

The National People's Congress voted 2,958 to 2 to remove the two-term limit on the presidency, enabling Xi Jinping to rule indefinitely; the amendment was preceded by rare public dissent that was quickly censored online.

The Amendment

Article 79 of the PRC Constitution had since 1982 limited the President to two consecutive five-year terms — a provision introduced specifically to prevent a return to Maoist-style lifelong rule. On March 11, 2018, the National People's Congress voted 2,958 to 2 (with 3 abstentions) to remove this limit, enabling Xi Jinping to serve as President indefinitely. The amendment also enshrined "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" in the constitution.

Public Reaction and Censorship

Rare public dissent appeared online before the vote: Winnie the Pooh images (a long-running meme comparing Xi's appearance to the cartoon bear) were blocked; the letter "N" was briefly censored on Weibo as a mathematical symbol for "unlimited" terms; phrases like "I disagree" were filtered. Academic Xu Zhangrun published a widely-shared essay opposing the move, for which he was later detained. The internet discussion was rapidly suppressed but not before spreading internationally.

Historical Significance

The removal of term limits was the most significant constitutional change since the 1982 reform. It represented the definitive reversal of the post-Mao collective leadership consensus and the institutional safeguards built after the Cultural Revolution. Xi has now served longer as General Secretary than any leader since Mao. The amendment transformed China's political trajectory from a system of routinised succession toward what many analysts describe as personal authoritarian rule — a trajectory whose long-term consequences remain unresolved.

Narrative Comparison

SourceNarrative
PRC Official NarrativeThe amendment aligns the presidency with Party and military leadership structures, ensuring continuity and stability for long-term national rejuvenation.
Western Academic AssessmentScholars view the amendment as the definitive end of the post-Mao consensus on collective leadership and term limits, reversing institutional safeguards designed to prevent another Cultural Revolution. (Shirk, 2022)